The Tesla Virtual Power Plant: Distributed Utility Of The Future

Via Inverse, an article on a vision of a distributed utility of the future:

Elon Musk has a radical plan to reshape the energy grid — and it could protect against power cuts.

During Tesla’s first-quarter 2021 earnings call Monday, the CEO described how the firm’s solar panels and batteries can work together to “operate as a giant distributed utility.” The way it plans to approach this is to pool solar resources in an innovative way.

Unlike a traditional grid with big power stations feeding power to hundreds of homes, the panels would harvest energy and recharge batteries at an individual home. That energy could then be fed back into the grid and distributed to other homes, creating what are effectively miniature power stations.

“I’m not sure how many people will actually understand this, but this is extremely profound,” Musk said. “And necessary, because we are headed towards a world where [...] people are moving towards electric vehicles.”


Musk cited several reasons as to why homes would need to act now:

  1. An increase in electric vehicles. Musk claimed that the grid would need around twice as much electricity if all transport goes electric.
  2. widespread shift to renewables. Musk claimed that, if heating also switches to renewables, the world would need around three times as much electricity total to fully power the clean energy future.
  3. “We’re seeing more extreme weather events,” Musk said. “This is a recipe for disaster.”
  4. The alternative would be more and longer power lines everywhere, plus an increase in power plants.

Musk has touted the benefits of solar energy plus batteries before. In October 2016, when he demonstrated a “house of the future,” he showed how a Tesla Powerwall battery (a slightly modified version of the battery in Tesla cars) could pair with Tesla Solar Roof tiles to collect energy while the sun is shining and store it in the battery. This setup means the house has 24-hour access to clean energy.

A virtual power plant takes this to a new level. Instead of supplying energy to a single home when needed, a Powerwall battery is instead employed to feed energy back to the grid at specified times.

Tesla has already made some moves toward this future. It’s rolled out “virtual power plants” in South AustraliaRhode Island, Massachusetts, and other areas. In July 2018, a Tesla virtual power plant in Vermont was able to use 500 Powerwall batteries to plug the energy gap during a heatwave.


In the United Kingdom, Tesla rolled out the Tesla Energy Plan in partnership with energy provider Octopus Energy in November 2019. Architect Richard Hawkes, one of the scheme’s early adopters, told Inverse that he gave up control of his Powerwall battery as part of the deal. Hawkes could no longer control settings like how much electricity to store to protect against a power cut, but in exchange, he receives a cheaper price on his electricity bills.

Musk’s comments come in the same month as Tesla announces big changes to its clean energy products. The firm has tweaked its Tesla Solar Roof pricing so it now factors in roof complexity. The change saw prices rise by about 30 percent for buyers, even though they’d already signed a contract.

“We did find that we basically made some significant mistakes in assessing the difficulty of certain roofs,” Musk said.

Tesla also announced it would no longer sell solar panels and Powerwall batteries separately. Musk justified the move by claiming it would simplify installations.

This ties in well to Musk’s overall goal to massively expand the size of Tesla’s energy business.

In July 2020, Musk declared that he’d like to see the energy business one day reach around the same size as Tesla’s automotive business. At the time, the energy business accounted for just six percent of the firm’s overall revenue.

Little has changed nearly a year later, with energy generation and storage accounting for around five percent of overall revenue in the first quarter 2021 report. Last year, competitor Sunrun deployed more than double the solar capacity of Tesla in 2020, deploying 455 megawatt-hours.

Tesla touted strong growth in its latest quarterly report, as energy storage deployments grew 71 percent year-over-year, but it’s still a ways off Musk’s ambitious goal. Tesla aims to reach volume production of its advanced battery cells, ultimately expanding to three terawatt-hours of annual production by 2030.

As the infrastructure emerges for Tesla’s new approach to energy, it’s perhaps the battery cells that could help it reach those lofty revenue goals.

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 29th, 2021 at 10:02 am and is filed under Uncategorized.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  Both comments and pings are currently closed. 

Comments are closed.

About This Blog And Its Author
As potential uses for building and parking lot roofspace continue to grow, unique opportunities to understand and profit from this trend will emerge. Roof Options is committed to tracking the evolving uses of roof estate – spanning solar power, rainwater harvesting, wind power, gardens & farms, “cooling” sites, advertising, apiculture, and telecom transmission platforms – to help unlock the nascent, complex, and expanding roofspace asset class.

Educated at Yale University (Bachelor of Arts - History) and Harvard (Master in Public Policy - International Development), Monty Simus has held a lifelong interest in environmental and conservation issues, primarily as they relate to freshwater scarcity, renewable energy, and national park policy. Working from a water-scarce base in Las Vegas with his wife and son, he is the founder of Water Politics, an organization dedicated to the identification and analysis of geopolitical water issues arising from the world’s growing and vast water deficits, and is also a co-founder of SmartMarkets, an eco-preneurial venture that applies web 2.0 technology and online social networking innovations to motivate energy & water conservation. He previously worked for an independent power producer in Central Asia; co-authored an article appearing in the Summer 2010 issue of the Tulane Environmental Law Journal, titled: “The Water Ethic: The Inexorable Birth Of A Certain Alienable Right”; and authored an article appearing in the inaugural issue of Johns Hopkins University's Global Water Magazine in July 2010 titled: “H2Own: The Water Ethic and an Equitable Market for the Exchange of Individual Water Efficiency Credits.”